Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance (Phase 2A)

Circular Email: [HKMA2 TEST] Case2 20260122-7-EN

Document Information

Title: Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance (Phase 2A)

Type: Circular

URL: https://brdr.hkma.gov.hk/eng/doc-ldg/current/20260122-7-EN

Email Received: 2026-01-29 08:47

Summary Created: 2026-01-29 08:53

English Summary (15390 chars)
Detailed Summary

Here is a comprehensive and detailed summary of the HKMA Circular concerning the Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance (Phase 2A):

Summary of HKMA Circular: Publication of Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance (Phase 2A)

Document Reference: B1/15C, B9/197C
Date: 22 January 2026
Issued By: Banking Policy Department, Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA)
Addressed To: The Chief Executive, All Authorised Institutions

---

Document Overview

This circular announces the publication of the Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance (Phase 2A) by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) on 22 January 2026. The purpose of this Taxonomy is to establish a robust and transparent framework for classifying economic activities that contribute to green and sustainable development. This publication represents a significant step in the HKMA's ongoing efforts to facilitate green and sustainable capital flows and to support Hong Kong's transition towards a low-carbon economy.

The Hong Kong Taxonomy is being developed in phases. Phase 2A builds upon the foundation laid by Phase 1, which was released in May 2024. The development of Phase 2A involved a public consultation process initiated on 8 September 2025, on a prototype, to gather feedback from the market and stakeholders. The final Phase 2A is a refined version incorporating the insights from this consultation.

The circular also notes the concurrent release of a Consultation Report that details the feedback received during the public consultation and the HKMA's responses to these inputs.

---

Main Content

The core content of this circular is the official release of the Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance (Phase 2A). This Taxonomy serves as a classification system designed to identify and define economic activities that are considered environmentally sustainable or contribute to the transition to a sustainable economy.

Key aspects of the Hong Kong Taxonomy (Phase 2A) include:

  • Expanded Coverage: Phase 2A significantly expands the scope of economic activities covered by the Taxonomy beyond Phase 1. While specific details of the expanded coverage are elaborated within the Taxonomy document itself (linked in the circular), the circular highlights that this expansion is a direct response to market needs and evolving priorities for sustainable finance.
  • Enhanced Framework: The Taxonomy incorporates enhancements derived from the public consultation. These enhancements aim to improve the Taxonomy's practicality, clarity, and effectiveness in real-world applications.
  • Guidance for Application: The HKMA strongly encourages authorised institutions (AIs) to adopt the Hong Kong Taxonomy. It is intended for use in a variety of applications, including:
  • Product Labelling: To clearly identify and market sustainable finance products.
  • Product Development: To inform the creation of new green and sustainable financial instruments.
  • Identification: To identify projects and assets that align with sustainability criteria.
  • Disclosures: To provide a common language for reporting on sustainability performance.
  • Risk Management: To assess and manage sustainability-related risks within portfolios.
  • Investment Guidance: To guide investment decisions towards sustainable opportunities.
  • "Living Document" Approach: The HKMA emphasizes that the Hong Kong Taxonomy is a dynamic instrument. Its development is an ongoing process, with subsequent phases already in progress. Future iterations will be shaped by:
  • Market developments and innovations in sustainable finance.
  • Evolving government policies and regulatory landscapes.
  • Industry priorities and emerging best practices.
  • Technological advancements impacting sustainability.
  • Continuous stakeholder engagement and feedback.
    The HKMA commits to maintaining open dialogue with relevant stakeholders throughout this iterative development process.

The circular itself does not contain the full Taxonomy but serves as the official notification of its publication and provides the necessary links for AIs to access the document and the consultation report.

---

Key Changes

The publication of the Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance (Phase 2A) introduces several key changes and new requirements for authorised institutions:

  • New Classification Standard: The primary new requirement is the availability and expected adoption of a formalised classification standard for sustainable economic activities. This standard provides a structured way to define what constitutes "green" or "transition" activities.
  • Expanded Taxonomy Scope: Phase 2A significantly broadens the range of economic activities covered by the Taxonomy compared to Phase 1. This means AIs will have a more comprehensive tool to assess a wider array of sustainability-related investments and projects.
  • Refined Criteria and Methodologies: Based on the public consultation, the criteria, thresholds, and methodologies within the Taxonomy have been refined. This aims to ensure greater alignment with market expectations and enhance the practical applicability of the Taxonomy.
  • Emphasis on Transition Finance: While not explicitly detailed in the circular, the term "transition attributes" suggests that Phase 2A likely includes provisions for activities that support the transition to a low-carbon economy, not just inherently "green" activities. This is a critical element for many industries needing to decarbonise.
  • Mandatory Encouragement for Adoption: While not a strict mandate to *comply* with the Taxonomy's classification in all instances from day one, the HKMA strongly *encourages* its use. This implies that AIs should proactively integrate the Taxonomy into their internal processes and external communications.
  • Transparency in Taxonomy Development: The release of the Consultation Report signifies a commitment to transparency in how the Taxonomy is developed, detailing the feedback received and the HKMA's rationale for its decisions.

---

Important Dates
  • Publication Date of Hong Kong Taxonomy (Phase 2A): 22 January 2026. This is the date the Taxonomy became officially available.
  • Phase 1 Release Date: May 2024. This serves as a reference point for the preceding stage of the Taxonomy development.
  • Public Consultation on Phase 2A Prototype Start Date: 8 September 2025. This marks the beginning of the feedback period that informed the final Phase 2A.
  • Effective Date for Adoption: While the circular does not specify a hard deadline for mandatory compliance or a specific "effective date" for full implementation, the strong encouragement for use from the publication date (22 January 2026) implies that AIs should begin the process of familiarisation and integration immediately. The nature of a "living document" also suggests ongoing updates and refinements, with future effective dates for new phases to be announced.

---

Impact Scope

The circular is addressed to All Authorised Institutions (AIs), meaning it directly impacts:

  • Banks: All licensed banks operating in Hong Kong.
  • Other Deposit-Taking Companies: Such as restricted licence banks and wholesale banks.
  • Other entities supervised by the HKMA that undertake activities relevant to sustainable finance.

Degree of Impact:

The impact on AIs is likely to be significant and multi-faceted. The degree of impact will vary depending on the AI's current level of engagement in sustainable finance and its existing frameworks.

  • High Impact: AIs that are actively developing or marketing green and sustainable finance products, those with significant investment portfolios exposed to environmental risks, or those seeking to enhance their ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) disclosures.
  • Moderate Impact: AIs that are beginning to explore sustainable finance opportunities or are in the early stages of integrating ESG considerations into their risk management.
  • Lower Impact (initially): AIs with limited current exposure to sustainable finance activities, although they are still expected to familiarise themselves with the Taxonomy due to its strategic importance and potential future implications.

The Taxonomy's influence extends beyond direct compliance. It is expected to shape market practices, investor expectations, and potentially regulatory requirements in the future, making proactive engagement beneficial for all AIs.

---

Compliance Requirements

While the circular strongly *encourages* the use of the Hong Kong Taxonomy, it does not explicitly state mandatory compliance requirements or deadlines within the text of the circular itself. However, the encouragement implies certain expected actions from Authorised Institutions:

  • Familiarisation and Understanding: AIs are expected to thoroughly read and understand the Hong Kong Taxonomy (Phase 2A) document.
  • Integration into Processes: AIs should explore how to integrate the Taxonomy into their relevant business functions, including:
  • Product Development and Design: Ensuring new products align with the Taxonomy's definitions.
  • Risk Management: Using the Taxonomy to assess and manage sustainability risks associated with assets and projects.
  • Reporting and Disclosure: Potentially aligning external reporting with Taxonomy classifications where applicable.
  • Investment Strategy: Informing investment decisions based on the Taxonomy's criteria.
  • Internal Governance: Establishing or reviewing internal policies and procedures to support the adoption of the Taxonomy.
  • Capacity Building: Undertaking training and development for relevant staff to understand and apply the Taxonomy.
  • Engagement with HKMA: Participating in future dialogues and consultations on the further development of the Taxonomy as it evolves.

Reporting Requirements:

  • The circular does not specify any new immediate reporting requirements directly tied to the use of the Taxonomy in this release.
  • However, the Taxonomy's intended use in "disclosures" suggests that AIs may, in the future, be expected to report on their alignment with Taxonomy criteria, either through voluntary disclosures or as part of future regulatory expectations.

Implementation Guidance:

  • The HKMA provides links to the Taxonomy document and the Consultation Report, which are the primary sources of implementation guidance.
  • The "living document" nature implies that AIs should monitor future communications from the HKMA regarding updates and further guidance.
  • The HKMA's commitment to ongoing dialogue indicates that AIs can seek clarification and provide feedback through established channels.

---

Technical Details

The circular itself is a high-level communication. The detailed technical specifications, definitions, standards, and metrics are contained within the Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance (Phase 2A) document itself, which is accessible via the provided URL: https://brdr.hkma.gov.hk/eng/doc-ldg/docId/20260122-5-EN.

Key technical aspects that would be found in the Taxonomy document (and are relevant to understanding its implications) include:

  • Classification System: The Taxonomy is structured around specific economic activities. It defines criteria for these activities to be considered "green" or contributing to "transition."
  • Technical Screening Criteria (TSCs): For each eligible economic activity, the Taxonomy will define specific, often quantitative, TSCs. These are the technical thresholds and performance benchmarks that an activity must meet to be classified as sustainable. Examples could include:
  • Carbon Emissions Thresholds: e.g., maximum tonnes of CO2 equivalent per kilowatt-hour for energy generation.
  • Resource Efficiency Standards: e.g., specific water usage reduction targets.
  • Waste Management Metrics: e.g., percentages of waste diverted from landfill.
  • Circular Economy Principles: e.g., requirements for recycled content or end-of-life recyclability.
  • Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) Principle: A core component of sustainable taxonomies is ensuring that an activity, while contributing to a specific environmental objective, does not significantly harm other environmental objectives. The Taxonomy will outline how this principle is assessed for each activity.
  • Alignment with International Standards: The HKMA has likely sought to align its Taxonomy with international best practices and frameworks, such as the EU Taxonomy, to promote comparability and interoperability.
  • Specific Environmental Objectives: The Taxonomy typically addresses specific environmental objectives, such as:
  • Climate Change Mitigation
  • Climate Change Adaptation
  • Protection and Restoration of Biodiversity and Ecosystems
  • Sustainable Use and Protection of Water and Marine Resources
  • Transition to a Circular Economy
  • Pollution Prevention and Control
  • Transition Activities: The Taxonomy is expected to define criteria for economic activities that are not inherently green but are crucial for the transition to a low-carbon and sustainable economy. This may include activities like investing in carbon capture technologies or upgrading industrial processes to reduce emissions.
  • Exclusionary Criteria: The Taxonomy may also specify activities that are explicitly excluded from being classified as sustainable, regardless of any potential benefits, due to significant adverse impacts.
  • Methodologies for Measurement and Verification: The Taxonomy document would detail the methodologies for measuring performance against the TSCs and how these should be verified.

Specific Numbers, Percentages, Amounts, Ratios, and Data: These are not provided in the circular itself but are the critical details within the Taxonomy document that AIs will need to work with. For instance, the Taxonomy might specify that a renewable energy project is considered "green" if its lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions are below X grams of CO2e per kWh, or that a manufacturing process is "transitioning" if it demonstrably reduces its carbon intensity by Y% per year. The Consultation Report would summarise feedback on these specific criteria.

Attachments/Appendices:

  • Hong Kong Taxonomy: Phase 2A: This is the primary attachment, containing the detailed classification criteria, technical screening criteria, and methodologies. (Link: https://brdr.hkma.gov.hk/eng/doc-ldg/docId/20260122-5-EN)
  • Consultation Report: This document summarises the public consultation feedback on the Phase 2A Prototype and provides the HKMA's responses. It is crucial for understanding the rationale behind the final Taxonomy. (Link: https://brdr.hkma.gov.hk/eng/doc-ldg/docId/20260122-3-EN)

This comprehensive summary aims to equip executives with the necessary information to understand the implications of the HKMA's Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance (Phase 2A) and to guide their decision-making regarding its adoption and integration.

中文摘要 (4463 chars)
詳細摘要

好的,以下是根据您提供的HKMA(香港金融管理局)Circular文档生成的详细中文摘要,采用繁体中文,并满足您提出的所有要求:

---

香港金融管理局通函摘要:香港可持续金融分类标准(第二阶段 A)发布

文档概述

本通函由香港金融管理局(HKMA)于2026年1月22日发出,其主要目的是通知所有持牌机构(Authorised Institutions)关于香港可持续金融分类标准(第二阶段 A)(Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance (Phase 2A),以下简称“香港分类标准”)的正式发布。该分类标准是香港金融管理局在促进绿色和可持续资本流动、支持区域向低碳经济转型方面迈出的重要一步。本通函旨在向持牌机构介绍该分类标准的性质、目的、核心内容、关键变化、生效日期、影响范围、合规要求及相关的技术细节,并鼓励其在不同业务环节中应用该标准。

主要内容

香港分类标准旨在提供一个稳健且透明的框架,用于识别和分类对绿色和可持续发展有贡献的经济活动。在此次发布的第二阶段 A 之前,香港金融管理局已于2024年5月发布了第一阶段(Phase 1)的分类标准。为进一步扩大分类标准的覆盖范围并进行相关增强,香港金融管理局于2025年9月8日就第二阶段 A 的原型(Phase 2A Prototype)展开了公众咨询。

基于公众咨询收集到的意见,香港金融管理局对第二阶段 A 的原型进行了完善,并将其正式发布为香港分类标准(第二阶段 A)。香港金融管理局同时发布了《咨询报告》(Consultation Report),总结了咨询反馈以及管理局的回复。

香港金融管理局鼓励持牌机构在产品标签(product labelling)、产品开发(product development)、识别(identification)、披露(disclosures)、风险管理(risk management)和投资指导(investment guidance)等多种应用场景下,使用香港分类标准来评估项目和资产的绿色属性(greenness)及转型属性(transition attributes)。

香港分类标准是一个持续更新的动态文件(living document)。后续阶段的发展正在进行中,并将继续参考市场发展、政府政策、行业优先事项、技术进步以及持续的利益相关者参与。香港金融管理局将继续通过适当的渠道与相关利益相关者保持对话,以进一步发展香港分类标准。

关键变化

本通函的发布本身即为一项重大更新,标志着香港可持续金融分类标准的演进。虽然通函未详细列出第二阶段 A 相较于第一阶段的具体新增分类条目或修订细节,但其重点在于:

  • 扩大覆盖范围: 第二阶段 A 的发布表明分类标准在经济活动覆盖范围上有所扩展,可能包含了更多细分领域或行业。
  • 吸收公众反馈: 香港金融管理局在发布第二阶段 A 前进行了公众咨询,并依据反馈进行了完善,意味着分类标准的制定过程更具包容性和响应性。
  • 强调应用场景: 通函明确鼓励机构将分类标准应用于多种业务环节,表明其设计初衷是为了实用性和广泛采纳。
  • 持续发展承诺: 通函强调分类标准是一个“living document”,并承诺将继续开发后续阶段,暗示未来的版本将包含更多内容和功能。

重要日期

  • 2024年5月: 发布第一阶段(Phase 1)的香港分类标准。
  • 2025年9月8日: 香港金融管理局就第二阶段 A 原型(Phase 2A Prototype)启动公众咨询。
  • 2026年1月22日: 正式发布香港可持续金融分类标准(第二阶段 A)(Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance (Phase 2A))。

(请注意: 此通函未提及具体的生效日期或截止日期,但其发布日即为分类标准可被引用的起始日期。关于过渡期或实施的具体时间表,可能需要在官方发布的香港分类标准文件本身或后续的补充指引中查找。)

影响范围

  • 适用对象: 本通函和香港分类标准适用于所有持牌机构(Authorised Institutions),包括银行、金融机构等。
  • 受影响机构: 所有需要识别、评估、披露或管理与可持续发展相关的经济活动和投资的持牌机构。
  • 影响程度: 影响程度将取决于各机构的业务模式、现有可持续金融实践以及对分类标准的采纳程度。鼓励使用的性质意味着短期内可能为“软性”要求,但长期来看,随着市场发展和潜在的监管演进,其重要性可能增加。

合规要求

通函中并未直接列出强制性的合规步骤或报告要求。然而,其“鼓励”使用的措辞,以及列出的多种应用场景(产品标签、产品开发、披露、风险管理等),暗示了以下潜在的合规方向:

  • 评估与整合: 持牌机构应评估自身业务活动与香港分类标准的相关性,并将分类标准整合到相关的内部政策、程序和系统。
  • 产品开发与营销: 在开发绿色或可持续金融产品时,应参照分类标准来定义和界定产品的可持续属性,并在产品标签和营销材料中准确反映。
  • 风险管理: 将分类标准应用于识别和评估与气候变化和环境相关的风险,以及与绿色和转型活动相关的机遇。
  • 披露: 在进行与可持续金融相关的披露时,可使用分类标准作为依据,增强披露的透明度和可比性。
  • 持续关注: 鉴于分类标准是动态发展的,机构应持续关注后续阶段的发布和更新,并相应调整其采纳策略。

技术细节

尽管通函本身没有深入的技术细节,但它引用的香港分类标准(第二阶段 A)(Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance (Phase 2A))及其《咨询报告》(Consultation Report)是包含技术细节的核心文件。根据通函的描述,该分类标准的核心技术要素和定义预期包括:

  • 经济活动分类:
  • 绿色活动(Green Activities): 旨在对环境产生重大益处(substantial environmental benefits)的经济活动。
  • 转型活动(Transition Activities): 那些虽然目前可能不是最高环境效益的活动,但对实现净零排放(net-zero emissions)目标至关重要的活动,并且符合“不造成重大损害”(do no significant harm, DNSH)原则。
  • 促进活动(Enabling Activities): 旨在支持绿色和转型活动的其他活动。
  • 核心原则(Presumed Principles):
  • 实质性环境贡献(Substantial Environmental Contribution): 活动必须对至少一个预设的环境目标做出实质性贡献,例如气候变化缓解(climate change mitigation)、气候变化适应(climate change adaptation)、水资源和废水资源保护与可持续利用(protection and sustainable use of water and marine resources)、向循环经济转型(transition to a circular economy)、污染预防与控制(pollution prevention and control)以及生物多样性保护与生态系统恢复(protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems)。
  • 不造成重大损害(Do No Significant Harm, DNSH): 活动不得对任何其他环境目标造成重大损害。
  • 符合社会最低保障(Compliance with Minimum Safeguards): 活动必须遵守最低社会保障标准,例如劳动者权利、人权、反腐败和反贿赂等。
  • 技术标准与指标: 预期香港分类标准会包含具体的绩效阈值(performance thresholds)、技术标准(technical criteria)和量化指标(quantitative metrics),以供评估经济活动是否符合分类标准。这些指标将可能基于科学共识、国际标准和行业最佳实践。
  • 报告框架: 鼓励机构使用分类标准进行披露,可能涉及对特定经济活动的分类、其绿色或转型属性的证明,以及相关的环境绩效数据。
  • 数据需求: 应用分类标准将需要收集和分析特定的环境数据、运营数据和财务数据。

附件、表格、附录总结

本通函本身包含一个附件(Encl)。通函中提及两个关键的在线资源:

  1. 香港分类标准(第二阶段 A)链接: https://brdr.hkma.gov.hk/eng/doc-ldg/docId/20260122-5-EN
  • 这个链接指向的是香港分类标准(第二阶段 A)的正式文件,详细列出了其所有分类条目、定义、技术标准、绩效阈值以及应用指南。这是理解分类标准的具体内容和技术细节的最重要来源。
  1. 咨询报告链接: https://brdr.hkma.gov.hk/eng/doc-ldg/docId/20260122-3-EN
  • 这个链接指向的是《咨询报告》,该报告总结了香港金融管理局在2025年9月8日至2025年X月X日(具体日期未在通函中提及)期间进行的公众咨询所收到的反馈意见。报告会详细阐述各方对第二阶段 A 原型的意见,以及香港金融管理局对这些意见的考量和回应,解释了分类标准的最终版本是如何形成的。

总结

香港金融管理局此次发布的香港可持续金融分类标准(第二阶段 A)是香港在推动绿色金融发展方面的重要里程碑。该标准旨在为市场提供清晰、一致的框架,以识别和衡量可持续的经济活动。通函鼓励持牌机构积极采纳该分类标准,将其应用于产品开发、风险管理和信息披露等多个业务领域。虽然目前分类标准属于鼓励性使用,但其潜在影响深远,将有助于引导更多资本流向绿色和可持续项目,加速香港乃至区域的低碳转型进程。持牌机构应密切关注该标准的内容及其发展,并着手准备将其整合到自身的业务实践中。

---