Enclosure - Smart Tips on the Treatment of Politically Exposed Persons_Version 2.0

Annex Email: HKMA E-mail Alert of 31 August 2026 (05:00 p.m. HKT)

Document Information

Title: Enclosure - Smart Tips on the Treatment of Politically Exposed Persons_Version 2.0

Type: Annex

URL: https://brdr.hkma.gov.hk/eng/doc-ldg/docId/20260827-5-EN

Email Received: 2026-08-31 19:11

Summary Created: 2026-08-31 14:00

English Summary
Quick section switch
Management Summary
  • Purpose / Background: The HKMA’s "Smart Tips on the Treatment of PEPs (Version 2.0)" clarifies the risk-based approach (RBA) for managing Politically Exposed Persons. It aims to prevent the abuse of public office for money laundering while ensuring that PEPs are not stigmatized and that compliance resources are optimized.
  • One-line conclusion: Financial institutions must adopt a risk-proportionate approach, applying mandatory Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) to Non-Hong Kong PEPs, while treating Hong Kong/International Organization PEPs as standard customers unless they are specifically assessed as high-risk.
  • Key Changes:
  • Explicit differentiation between "Non-Hong Kong PEPs" (always require EDD) and "Hong Kong/International Organization PEPs" (EDD required only if high-risk).
  • Introduction of a "holistic relationship-based review" to manage PEP families/associates efficiently.
  • Updated guidance on "Former PEPs," emphasizing that EDD should cease if the individual no longer poses a high ML/TF risk.
  • Focus on using publicly available data (e.g., official salary scales, declarations of interest) to verify Source of Wealth (SoW), reducing the burden on customers.
  • Key Dates / Deadlines: Version 2.0 is effective as of August 2026.
  • Applicability / Impact scope: All authorized institutions (AIs) under HKMA supervision. Impact includes adjustments to onboarding workflows, ongoing monitoring systems, and staff training modules.
  • Recommended management actions:
  • Conduct a gap analysis between current PEP policies and the risk-proportionate guidance in Version 2.0.
  • Update internal automated screening and risk-scoring logic to distinguish between PEP categories.
  • Implement a "dedicated team" or "specialized workflow" for PEP onboarding to improve communication and reduce friction.
  • Establish a formal, risk-based methodology for "de-classifying" former PEPs from EDD status.
  • Review existing EDD templates to incorporate "publicly available information" as a valid verification source for SoW.
Detailed Summary
  1. Document overview: This guidance clarifies the definition of PEPs, the application of the risk-based approach, and practical strategies for managing PEPs, their family members, and close associates. It applies to all HKMA-regulated institutions.
  1. Main requirements:
  • Identification: Use a combination of customer declaration, CDD, commercial databases, and media/internet searches.
  • Categorization: Distinguish between Non-HK PEPs (require EDD) and HK/International Org PEPs (require standard CDD unless high-risk).
  • Family & Associates: Apply a proportionate approach; they do not hold public office, so treatment should be sensitive to the nature of the link.
  • Ongoing Monitoring: Maintain dynamic monitoring to capture status changes (e.g., someone leaving office).
  1. Key changes:
  • Refinement of "Former PEPs": Provides clear criteria (time elapsed, influence remaining, seniority) to determine when to stop EDD.
  • Good Practices: Introduction of "holistic relationship-based review" to avoid duplicate checks for families during election cycles.
  • Efficiency: Shift from intrusive document requests (e.g., long-term bank statements) to utilizing official government publications/market research for SoW verification.
  1. Important dates & transition:
  • Document Version: 2.0.
  • Effective Date: August 2026.
  1. Impact and risks:
  • Operations: Reduced friction for low-risk HK PEPs.
  • Compliance: Risk of over-screening or inconsistent application of EDD across branches.
  • IT/Data: Need to flag PEPs by type (Non-HK vs. HK/Intl) to automate the correct CDD/EDD triggers.
  1. Compliance action checklist:
  • Audit current "Former PEP" offboarding procedures.
  • Train staff on using publicly available data for SoW verification (e.g., Civil Service Bureau pay scales).
  • Update internal policies to reflect that Hong Kong PEPs are "lower risk" in the absence of other red flags.
  • Establish a feedback loop between frontline staff and compliance via proactive reviews rather than reactive, case-by-case auditing.
  1. Appendices/attachments summary:
  • The document functions as a standalone guidance paper ("Smart Tips"). It includes illustrative "Good Practice" case studies (pp. 6-8) detailing how to implement risk-based onboarding for mortgages, high-risk industry entities, and complex wealth structures. These examples serve as operational benchmarks for banks to optimize internal resources.
中文摘要
快速切換摘要區塊
管理層摘要
  • 目的/背景: 本指引旨在協助認可機構(AIs)採用風險為本的方法,正確識別及處理政治敏感人物(PEP),並釐清香港本地 PEP 與非香港 PEP 在盡職審查(CDD)上的要求差異,避免過度合規造成的客戶摩擦。
  • 一句話結論: 機構應針對香港本地及國際組織 PEP 採取靈活的風險評估,僅在確信業務關係屬「高洗錢/恐怖分子資金籌集(ML/TF)風險」時,才需啟動特定的強化盡職審查(EDD)措施。
  • 關鍵變更:
  • 明確區分 PEP 類別: 非香港 PEP 必須執行 EDD;香港及國際組織 PEP 則視風險評估結果而定,非高風險者可視為一般客戶處理。
  • 強調「風險為本」的靈活性: 對於香港 PEP,鼓勵運用公開資訊驗證財富來源(如公務員薪資表、財產申報),而非一律要求提供長年期銀行對帳單。
  • 引入「整體關係審查」: 允許對 PEP 及其關聯人士採取組合式的審查,以減少重複作業。
  • 前任 PEP 處理: 重申離職後風險隨時間遞減,若評估後不再具高風險,可終止其 EDD 措施。
  • 重要日期 / 截止日: 本文件為 Version 2.0(2026 年 8 月生效)。
  • 適用對象 / 影響範圍: 所有受香港金管局監管的認可機構,特別是客戶經理、合規部門及反洗錢(AML)風險控管團隊。
  • 管理層建議行動:
  • 檢視並更新內部政策: 確保關於香港 PEP 的處理流程已轉向風險為本,而非採取「一刀切」的 EDD。
  • 強化前線訓練: 提升前線人員識別及處理 PEP 的專業技巧,以平衡合規要求與客戶服務品質。
  • 優化審查效率: 參考文件中的「Good Practices」,導入整體關係審查法,減少不必要的合規行政負擔。
  • 建立 proactive 監測: 透過審計或滿意度調查,主動檢視前線執行 PEP 政策的成效,而非僅被動處理投訴。
詳細摘要
  1. 文檔概述
  • 性質: HKMA 發布的指引(Version 2.0),旨在提供處理 PEP 的實務「Smart Tips」。
  • 目的: 確保機構在防範洗錢風險的同時,能公允地對待 PEP,避免因過度合規損害業務關係。
  1. 主要要求
  • 識別機制: 採用多源資訊,包括 CDD 資料、客戶申報(須經核實)、第三方商用數據庫及網路公開資訊。
  • 非香港 PEP: 無論風險等級為何,均需執行 PEP 專屬的 EDD 措施。
  • 香港/國際組織 PEP: 採取風險為本的門檻,僅在確認屬「高風險」時執行 EDD。
  • EDD 核心動作: 確認財富與資金來源、取得高級管理層批准、執行強化持續監測(含年度審查)。
  1. 關鍵變更
  • 區分了「針對性處理」: 過去常因 PEP 標籤而自動啟動 EDD,現明確指出對於香港 PEP 應先進行風險評估。
  • 明確「前任 PEP」過渡: 離職後應進行風險評估,若風險降低可取消 EDD,並恢復一般客戶待遇。
  1. 重要日期與過渡安排
  • 版本: Version 2.0,標註日期為 2026 年 8 月。機構需於此時點前完成相關內控與程序的調整。
  1. 對機構的影響與風險
  • 營運: 透過合理的風險切割,可大幅減少合規人力重複投入。
  • 合規: 若未落實風險評估而對香港 PEP 一律啟動 EDD,可能面臨客戶服務滿意度下降的風險。
  • IT/資料: 需確保監測系統能識別職位異動,並支援對「關聯人士(親屬/親信)」的風險分級。
  1. 合規動作清單(Checklist)
  • [ ] 檢查是否仍對所有香港 PEP 採取一律 EDD 的做法(若有,應修訂為風險為本)。
  • [ ] 確認是否已建立前任 PEP 的風險退出機制與評估標準。
  • [ ] 審查針對 PEP 財富來源驗證的程序,是否允許使用官方公開資料(如薪資標準)替代客戶提供繁複證明。
  • [ ] 是否已針對前線人員提供 PEP 處理技巧的持續培訓。
  1. 附件/附錄摘要
  • 本文檔內含定義區塊、香港重要公職範例(如行政長官、主要官員、大法官等)、以及針對前任 PEP 的風險判斷因素表。這些內容提供了實務上的量化基準,是執行風險評估時的判斷依據。
風險 / 審計心智圖 Risk & Internal-Audit Mind Map

載入心智圖中… Loading…