Annex 1 - Chapter III - STC approach

Annex Email: HKMA E-mail Alert of 21 August 2026 (05:00 p.m. HKT)

Document Information

Title: Annex 1 - Chapter III - STC approach

Type: Annex

URL: https://brdr.hkma.gov.hk/eng/doc-ldg/docId/20260810-2-EN

Email Received: 2026-08-21 19:11

Summary Created: 2026-08-21 14:02

English Summary
Quick section switch
Management Summary
  • Purpose / Background: This document provides supplementary guidance for Authorized Institutions (AIs) regarding the Standardized (Credit Risk) (STC) approach under the Banking (Capital) Rules (BCR). It clarifies regulatory expectations for credit risk management, due diligence, and capital treatment of various exposures, aligning with the Basel Framework.
  • One-line conclusion: AIs must perform independent credit assessments, integrate climate-related financial risks, and ensure robust documentation/mapping of internal risk grades to external credit ratings to ensure compliance.
  • Key Changes:
  • Independent Due Diligence: AIs must conduct their own credit assessments rather than relying solely on external ratings.
  • Climate Risk Integration: Climate-related financial risks must be incorporated into due diligence and credit risk assessments on a "best effort" basis.
  • SCRA Application: Standardized Credit Risk Assessment (SCRA) for bank exposures now requires quarterly updates of quantitative ratios where applicable.
  • Covered Bond Eligibility: Stringent criteria for cover pool assets (LTV ratios, 10% overcollateralization, and semi-annual reporting) must be met for favorable risk-weighting.
  • Defaulted Exposure Treatment: Specific guidance on facility-level vs. obligor-level defaults, including materiality thresholds.
  • Key Dates / Deadlines: Effective August 2026.
  • Applicability / Impact scope: All AIs in Hong Kong using the STC approach for capital adequacy purposes.
  • Recommended management actions:
  • Update internal credit policies to explicitly include climate-related financial risk assessment as part of the onboarding and annual review process.
  • Review and update mapping schemes between internal credit quality grades and external ratings to ensure they are robust and defensible.
  • Establish clear, documented materiality thresholds for defaulted exposures as permitted under §67(4).
  • Ensure robust data collection for covered bond exposures to verify LTV and collateral requirements semi-annually.
  • Verify that all "exempt commitments" are supported by rigorous, documented day-to-day monitoring independent of the front office.
Detailed Summary

1) Document overview
This document serves as the official HKMA FAQ and guidance for Chapter III (STC Approach). It clarifies requirements for credit risk assessments, definitions of institutional categories, and specific capital treatment for various asset classes.

2) Main requirements

  • Due Diligence (§54C): AIs must conduct internal credit assessments at origination and at least annually. Reliance on external ratings is prohibited as a sole basis for risk assessment.
  • Mapping: Mapping internal credit grades to external ratings is required. Models are acceptable, but they must not result in a lower risk-weight than those determined by external ratings.
  • SCRA: For bank exposures, AIs must assess the bank’s capacity to meet commitments and its compliance with regulatory ratios. Latest publicly available data must be used for quarterly updates.

3) Key changes (vs previous requirements)

  • Climate Risk: Formal mandate to integrate climate-related financial risk into credit due diligence on a best-effort basis, acknowledging current data limitations.
  • QNBFI Eligibility: Entities must be subject to a regulatory/supervisory framework equivalent to banks to qualify as a QNBFI; if uncertain, treat as general corporate.
  • Off-balance Sheet: Clarified CCF treatments, particularly regarding "uncommitted" facilities which are still subject to CCF if they meet the definition of a "commitment."

4) Important dates & transition

  • Guidance effective date: August 2026.

5) Impact and risks

  • Compliance Risk: Misclassification of QNBFI or failure to properly map internal grades to external ratings may result in capital under-reporting.
  • Operational Risk: Need to integrate climate risk assessment into existing credit workflows without creating undue administrative burden.

6) Compliance action checklist

  • [ ] Review all external ratings-based risk weights to ensure independent validation is in place.
  • [ ] Verify that internal credit systems can track current LTV ratios for covered bond cover pools.
  • [ ] Define "materiality" thresholds for defaulted exposures internally and ensure they are documented and defensible.
  • [ ] Ensure the "party independent of the front office" is identified for the purpose of monitoring exempt commitments.

7) Appendices/attachments summary

  • The document functions as a comprehensive FAQ covering 140+ questions across 17 sections. No external appendices are included; the content focuses on specific BCR sections (§2 to §141) to ensure operational clarity for capital computation.
中文摘要
快速切換摘要區塊
管理層摘要
  • 目的/背景: 本文檔為 HKMA 針對《銀行(資本)規則》(BCR)中有關標準化計量法(STC approach)的監管問答集(FAQ),旨在釐清信用風險資產權重計算、盡職調查、抵押品認可及債務違約認定等實務執行細節。
  • 一句話結論: 銀行必須在資本計量中嚴格執行內部信用評估(而非完全依賴外部評級),並確保在氣候風險、合格擔保債券及表外承諾等項目中,採行更為審慎的風險管理邏輯。
  • 關鍵變更:
  1. 盡職調查強化: 即便對評級債務,銀行亦須進行內部信用風險評估。
  2. 氣候風險整合: 要求銀行將氣候風險納入交易對手信用評估(Best effort basis)。
  3. 合格擔保債券(Covered Bonds)標準: 明訂 LTV(貸款價值比)計算及資產池構成的監管門檻。
  4. 表外承諾(CCF)定義: 明確「不可撤銷」與「承諾」的認定界限,並對未承諾授信額度執行 10%-40% 的信用轉換係數(CCF)。
  5. 違約認定(Defaulted Exposure): 授權銀行在評估個別違約時可採行更保守的「重大性」門檻認定。
  • 重要日期: 本文件標註為 August 2026 版本,適用於即日起的資本適足率申報與內部風險管控。
  • 適用對象: 香港認可機構(AIs)。
  • 管理層建議行動:
  1. 審查內部評級映射機制: 確保內部信用評級與外部評級的映射(Mapping)流程符合監管要求,特別是避免低估風險權重。
  2. 氣候風險納入流程: 在現有信用審查流程中,增設氣候風險定性/定量考量因子。
  3. 覆核擔保債券投資組合: 檢視目前持有之 Covered Bonds 是否符合 LTV 及資產池組成要求。
  4. 盤點表外授信承諾: 重新分類所有授信額度(Commitments),確保 CCF 係數選用正確。
  5. 更新違約認定政策: 修訂銀行內部的「違約 borrower」定義及重大性門檻,並確保其與集團政策一致且具備足夠審慎性。
詳細摘要
1) 文檔概述

本文件為 HKMA 針對《銀行(資本)規則》第 III 章 STC 計量法的補充指南,透過 Q&A 形式針對盡職調查、受監管實體分類、合格擔保債券與風險緩和措施提供明確指導。

2) 主要要求
  • 盡職調查(Due Diligence): 銀行不能僅依賴外部評級,需依據 obligor 大小與複雜度進行年度內部信用評估。對於集團內風險,需考量集團支持與風險傳導效應。
  • 氣候風險整合: 銀行需在交易對手信用週期內(含 onboard 與日常監控),依據 SPM GS-1 指引,以「最大努力原則」評估氣候因素。
  • 擔保債券 eligibility: 資產池需滿足 10% 超額擔保(overcollateralization),且成員資產 LTV 需符合要求(住宅 <80%、商業 <60%)。
  • 銀行/QNBFI 評估: 針對未評級銀行或 QNBFI,採用標準化信用風險評估(SCRA),銀行應利用最新公開數據進行評級(A/B/C 級)。
3) 關鍵變更
  • 違約認定: 即使部分貸款未逾期,若銀行依 §67(4) 評估 borrower 已整體違約,則該 obligor 所有貸款均須視為違約。
  • SCRA 調整: 若 Sovereign 權重為 100%,則該國之 B 級銀行風險權重不能低於 100%(即調至 150%)。
4) 重要日期與過渡安排
  • 現已生效。銀行在 2026 年 8 月後的資本申報中,須依據此指引進行風險加權資產(RWA)計算與合規證明。
5) 對機構的影響與風險
  • 營運/IT: 需更新風險引擎中的 Mapping 機制與 CCF 參數設定。
  • 合規: 需針對「不可撤銷」信用額度與「臨時」授信定義進行系統性審計,避免 CCF 錯誤申報。
6) 合規動作清單(Checklist)
  • [ ] 檢查是否將氣候風險納入信用風險評估政策。
  • [ ] 盤點所有表外授信並區分 Commitments 與 Exempt Commitments。
  • [ ] 確認 Covered Bonds 投資標的符合 LTV 監控要求。
  • [ ] 修訂重大性(Materiality)門檻,確保對於逾期與違約定義的保守性。
  • [ ] 驗證 QNBFI 身分,對於無法確認者,一律按企業(Corporate)標準處理。
7) 附件/附錄摘要
  • Table in Schedule 6 (CCF): 本部分說明了表外項目適用 CCF 之具體情境,包含賣出回購交易與承諾額度之認定,是資本申報與授信產品設計的核心基礎。
  • BCR §59A-C (SCRA): 定義了未評級銀行與 QNBFI 的風險權重決定流程,包含對資產品質 grade 的評定邏輯。
風險 / 審計心智圖 Risk & Internal-Audit Mind Map

載入心智圖中… Loading…